[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: 145.900 is not just used by pacsats!

I agree with these fellows in a modified way.  Indeed one of the most
useful frequencies on AO10 is 145.890/145.90 which is where APRS
experiments indicated best uplink thruput on Pacsat.  Coupled with the
notion that no immediate feedback occurs doing this results in confusion.
Satellite operations require well thought out, well documented and stable
systems.  APRS is far from that changing so rapidly that terrestrial
operators are hard pressed to know how to set up a given TNC for a given
satellite or even a UI frame for that matter!  Simply put, APRS needs to
become a bit more mature in satellite goals and history before continuing.
     Alternately, the 1200 baud satellites ARE underutilized but are
capable of far more than a simple digital repeater relaying multiple
transmissions on each pass rather than one large store and forward
communication.  The thought of APRS on AO27 is simply ludicrous!
     The contribution of members wanting simple FSK modems via sound
cards, nodes displaying large geographical areas are certainly welcome.
But certainly NOT at the expense of longterm AO10, Fuji or AO27 links
already in operation in both analog and digital modes.  Cliff K7RR

On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Dave Guimont wrote:

> At 11:01 AM 9/9/99 -0600, you wrote:
> >For those running mobile APRS on 145.900 for the pacsats
> >please note that 145.900 is also the downlink for AO-10
> >where ground stations are listening to week SSB DX signals.
> >They may get upset if you beacon often with high power when you
> >are near them.
> >
> >It also is on the edge of FO-20 and FO-29 analog transponders,
> >which may give you up to another 12 passes a day. These passes
> >are longer than the pacsats!
> >
> >Personally I do not feel good about beaconing blindly knowing about
> >these other satellites. With a omni directional uplink you do run a
> >chance of getting into the FO birds.
> >
> >73, Randy N7SFI
> Congratulations Randy!!
> I'm glad someone said it!!  It is idiotic to have a mode that does not 
> really convey much intelligence interfering with the modes that do........
> I'll never understand the rationale behind something that shows you your 
> callsign,even if it comes from Mars!!
>     73 Dave   wb6llo@amsat.org
>            Disagree; I learn.
> ----
> Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org

Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org