[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Tuning uplink -> AO-27
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Tuning uplink -> AO-27
- From: "KF4FDJ (Mike in Ft. Myers, FL)" <seven77@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 23:35:56 -0400
Fellow ops,
After receiving a private post from Steve Greene, KA1LM, a member of the
AO-27 integration team, I decided to try an experiment.
The basis for the experiment was to determine what effect tuning for
Doppler uplink while working AO-27 would have on the downlink signal.
I decided to try the experiment in my shack where I could monitor the
downlink more carefully than I could on a portable link.
I used a Yaesu FT-847 in full duplex "satellite" mode. The downlink
signal can be centered in the receiver pass band, by keeping a careful
eye on the discriminator meter, and tuning to keep the signal centered.
My uplink antenna is a KLM 22C. I believe it has 15 dBic gain. I have
a little less than 1 dB loss in my switches and coax on 2 meters. I
used The Station software, driving a Kansas City Tracker interface card,
which in turn drives the controller on a Yaesu 5400B rotator.
As I've intimated, the discriminator meter on the 847 makes tuning the
downlink easy. I used The Station software to calculate the doppler
correction on the uplink, and tuned the sub-tune knob to control the
uplink frequency.
I am fairly confident the antenna was pointed within 3 degrees of the
bird during the entire pass.
I tried 3 different times to adjust uplink frequency within the pass
band of the satellite receiver. Each time I tried 3 different power
levels. For comparison sake, here are the statistics for the 3 power
settings:
1) 1 watt PEP 25 watts ERP
2) 4 watts PEP 100 watts ERP
3) 10 watts 251 watts ERP
All three times I tried the experiment, the doppler shift on the 2 meter
uplink was in excess of 3.1 Hz. All three times, the results were
comparable. Here is what I found:
At power setting 3, I could not discern any difference in the audio of
the downlink signal, nor could I see a change in the S meter reading as
I moved the VFO from 145.850 to 3.1 kHz off to compensate for Doppler.
The signal did not vary on the S meter until I was close to 8 kHz away
from the calculated center of the pass band, including Doppler
correction. This bird DOES have a wide pass band!
At power setting 2, the results were very nearly the same as for power
setting 3, except, while I could not discern a change in the audio
signal, a slight deflection of the S meter was apparent as I moved from
145.850 to the calculated center of the pass band, including Doppler
correction. The signal dropped off noticeable when 7 kHz away from the
calculated center of the pass band, and in fact became noticeably
distorted.
The most dramatic results were obtained at power level 1. Again, I
could not discern any change in the audio qualities of the downlink
signal, and this is probably a result of the AGC circuitry in the 847.
S meter deflection was close to 1 S unit as I swished from 145.850 to
the calculated center of the pass band. The same distortion and dip in
audio was noticeable as with power setting 2, somewhere near 7 kHz away
from the calculated center of the pass band.
So, with a properly pointed uplink antenna, if tuning for Doppler can
show a 3 dB (half power) increase in perceived downlink signal, there
should be an advantage to tuning for Doppler with a portable station.
Off pointing of the antenna will decrease ERP, as will proximity to
metallic objects in the near field of the antenna.
I will continue to tune for Doppler while operating portable.
Feel free to make your own extrapolations, I might be missing something,
but it seems that tuning for Doppler will give you an advantage on a low
ERP uplink, and striving to put your signal into the center of the
receiver pass band has merit.
Nothing will prevent your signal from being trampled by a more powerful
station, or ignored by other operators, but strive for every advantage
you can muster.
73, Mike in Fort Myers, FL
__\/__
| . / ^ _ \ .
| |\| (o)(o) |/|
^ --- * -----------------.OOOo--oo--oOOO.------------------- *
||| | | * Mike Gilchrist - KF4FDJ ..... AMSAT Area Coordinator *
|X| | | * P.O. Box 763 ................ AMSAT member #31884 *
[X]~~~|k| * Fort Myers, FL 33902 ....... ARRL member #1781549 *
/ \ |f| * http://www.gate.net/~seven77 telephone 941.772.7907 *
| | |4| * kf4fdj@amsat.org ............................ EL96ap *
| P | |f| * I.S. Professional ..... CNA .... Computer Consultant *
| 3 |=|d| * AO10, AO27, FO20, FO29, RS13, RS15, MIR, E Layer *
| D | |j| * Bringing Oscar demos to the Lee County Schools. *
|_____|=| | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
/*X*\ | | * Black holes were created when God divided by zero. *
________|_|______________________________Oooo.________________________
.oooO ( )
( ) ) /
\ ( (_/
\_)
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home