[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
re: e-mail Doc Type HTML vs. Plain Text
- Subject: [amsat-bb] re: e-mail Doc Type HTML vs. Plain Text
- From: John Mock <kd6pag@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 10:53:44 -0800 (PST)
Why don't everyone just use plain text ?
Is there a reason for the HTML format ?
Does it not make the e-mail twice as long
as it needs to be. (two copies of the same text)
...
Are any of the PC users having this problem ?
Or is this just a problem for us Mac users ?
And it's a problem for LINUX users not using WWW browsers. It's probably
a problem for anyone not using such a browser or software intended to be
compatible with that. I just switched back, as Netscape 4.5 was too buggy
and it definitely seems more prevalent than i remember. Even before that,
it was a major irritation, as the resultant print size was hard to read.
Is there any reason that the AMSAT-BB remailer shouldn't reject messages
such as are described above? Or include a filter that removes HTML, or
does something equivalent. Exhortation appears not to be working at all,
as the problem is appears to be getting progressively worse.
-- KD6PAG (Networking Old-Timer...)
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home