[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
RE: MicroWave: 1296 Transverter design advice
- Subject: [amsat-bb] RE: MicroWave: 1296 Transverter design advice
- From: "Dave Metz" <Dave.Metz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 21:24:29 -0600
- Comments: Authenticated sender is <davemetz@pop.muscanet.com>
- In-reply-to: <A969F78C865BD1119B230000F8B8459603147D02@zrchb181.us.nortel.com>
> From: "David Robinson" <robinda@nortelnetworks.com>
> To: "'Dave Metz'" <davemetz@muscanet.com>
> Subject: RE: MicroWave: 1296 Transverter design advice
> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 19:55:12 -0500
> i would seriously consider not using 432 as the if due to the hamonic
> relationships between the 2 bands...the tx mixer will mix 432+864=1296 but
> 432x3=1296, at 1296.1 the tripled signal is only 200khz away from the mixed
> one making filtering difficult
>
> dave
>
> ww2r
Dear Dave,
Your right. I guess the question is "how good is the third harmonic suppression"
of the transmitter? So far I've been able to build filters with 60-70db of suppression
of the second harmonic on 222Mhz. I should be able to obtain as much or better
of the third (unless something is going on that I don't understand, that's sure possible :-)).
My plan is to use a three or four pole helical resonator to clean up the 432 signal.
What do you think?
I don't want to use two meters as the I.F. since that's my receiving I.F. for the 2.4Ghz
converter. So, I don't want to be transmitting in the same IF band that I'm receiving
in. Any ideas?
--73-- David WA0AUQ
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home