[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: APRSat Rumors!

Guys, I don't know if this is any consolation, but the movie "April in
Paris" is running on American Movie Classics--just caught it the other day.
 There is some apropos satire on the State Dept. and bureaucratic double
binds in that movie.  Ray Bolger without his scarecrow suit.  And of
course, Doris Day. . .

It's a product of a more innocent age.  But as the French say, "Plus ca
change, plus c'est la meme chose."  (loosely translated:  The more things
change, the more they stay the same).

73 from Peter, KD7MW

At 08:19 AM 02/13/1999 -0600, Andrew Reynolds wrote:

>On Fri, 12 Feb 1999, Bob Bruninga wrote:
>(bits of text snipped out)
>> But alas, the STATE DEPARTMENT just killed us!  Our FREE ride was on the
>> launch of a totally passive dummy 3,000 lb MASS being launched to test the
>> SEA LAUNCH system.  SInce the launch will be in international waters,
>> using a Russian Rocket, on a scandanavian ship with system integration by
>> Boeing,  BOEING had to get a Technology Export License from the State
>> Department for the Launch (This takes months if not years!).  Now, since
>> Boeing was going to add us (an active payload) to their dummy mass, STATE
>> DEPARTEMNT said NO.  They say, "this is a change to your export license
>> which will have to be modified and resubmitted."
>Ah, the joys of getting caught in the wheels of poltical infighting!
>State now has *total* control over what satellites leave the country for
>*any* non-US launch (including Arianespace!). Congress passed a rider
>last year on the Defense budget that moved control of satellite exports
>out of the Commerce Department and moved it back to State (where it had
>been the subject of much cursing on the part of satellite makers for
>many years). State can, for any reason, now deny an export license for
>*any* satellite with more than 20% content made in the USA. They can
>also take pretty much as long as they wish in issuing the license, and,
>if that weren't enough of a kick in the teeth, they must also notify
>Congress of the license, and then *they* get to put their $0.02 into
>the mix (yes, including denying the license).

Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org