[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Leap Second caution
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Leap Second caution
- From: Joe Fitzgerald <jfitzgerald@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 00:47:51 -0500
OK, so I am beating a dead horse. I have insomnia ... please be gentle
on me!
The following is from ftp://tycho.usno.navy.mil/pub/series/ser14.txt
U.S. NAVAL OBSERVATORY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20392-5420
July 23, 1998
No. 64
TIME SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT SERIES 14
UTC TIME STEP
1. The International Earth Rotation Service (IERS) has announced the
introduction of a time step to occur at the end of December, 1998.
2. Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) will be retarded by 1.0s so that
the sequence of dates of the UTC markers will be:
1998 December 31 23h 59m 59s
1998 December 31 23h 59m 60s
1999 January 01 0h 0m 0s
3. The difference between UTC and International Atomic Time (TAI) is:
from 1997 01 Jul, UTC to 1999 01 January, UTC: TAI-UTC= +31s
from 1999 01 Jan, UTC until further notice: TAI-UTC= +32s
4. The insertion of one leap second will be evident by the change of
sign of the DUT1 correction which will become positive. Extrapolated
values of DUT1 are distributed weekly in the IERS Bulletin A.
5. All coordinated time scales will be affected by this adjustment.
However, Loran-C and GPS will not be adjusted physically. Times of
Coincidence for LORAN-C are available on the Time Service Web Page
(http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/loran.html). For GPS, the leap second
correction contained within the UTC data of subframe 4, page 18 of
the navigation message transmitted by satellites will change.
Before the leap second
GPS-UTC = +12 (i.e., GPS is ahead of UTC by twelve seconds)
After the leap second
GPS-UTC = +13s (i.e., GPS will be ahead by thirteen seconds)
DENNIS D. McCARTHY
Director
Directorate of Time
Bill Jones wrote:
>
>
> > Did you notice most of the television shows counting down to the new year
> > did not have the correct time due to the leap second? They were all a
> > second too fast! Also, I know many "accurate time" TV and radio stations
> > are usually off a few seconds. I've seen the weather channel be off by as
> > much as 15 seconds. That time may be generated locally, with the local
> > forecast clock?
>
> I have a digital satellite dish, and was watching a raw PBS feed yesterday,
> where they have a test pattern with a clock zipping by on the bottom. My
> receiver has a clock that is automatically updated from the satellite service,
> and I had them on the screen at the same time, and they differed by 15
> seconds! This is time coming from the same downlink, one from the clock at
> the uplink site, one from the network. I bet this had some of the local
> stations confused. I forgot to watch my GPS and Oregon Sci WWV clock.
> My WWV clock seems to have the proper time. I know my OLD GPS, a
> Garmin GPS 50 did not pick up leap seconds, and over the years got more
> and more off time, but I think my newer one has better software. Interesting.
>
>
> +----------------------------------+
> | Bill Jones, N3JLQ,Sweden, Maine |
> | wejones@megalink.net |
> | http://www.megalink.net/~wejones |
> +----------------------------------+
> ----
> Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home