[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Still can't get InstantTrack to work without a co-processor
- Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Still can't get InstantTrack to work without a co-processor
- From: "Jim Shorney" <jshorn@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 23:13:37 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 28 Sep 1998 12:11:00 -0400, Jeffrey S Austin wrote:
>No, if you look at any x86 chip you'll see either a SXor DX. All SX
>chips are without the math co-processor but generally have a socket on
>the motherboard for that chip.
This rule ONLY applies to Intel 486 chips. With 386 chips, the SX or
DX refers to 16-bit or 32-bit data bus. Non-Intel "486" chips
(excepting AMD) are generally souped-up 386's.
- --
Jim Shorney -->.<--Put complaints in this box
jshorn@binary.net
nu0c@amsat.org
NU0C
Lincoln, NE, USA
EN10KA
http://homepage.usr.com/j/jshorney/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBNhBsgECBN4ScxcExAQEinwP+LQ448kM72Sp5Ai8fluP2V875wuhqZ35X
Rbfusw1TpRlFRGBFKxCsQfBSkbsi9yddwpRr18QI9UtubXjBno3YGsPQ93JoUI9s
pYZ6KLL6Fhy88XFMZs4qLg0iph87PbSlcj+qCz6GJCeI7ibCv9sUG7QQLNp6B8mH
wDkWb8r2jY4=
=FAYd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home