Dennis Dease wrote:
Jeffrey S Austin wrote:
>No, if you look at any x86 chip you'll see either a SXor DX. All SX
>chips are without the math co-processor but generally have a socket on
>the motherboard for that chip.
This is not entirely correct. The x86 chips prior to the 80486 did not offer
integrated math processors. The SX/DX designation used with the 80386
indicated the internal data path structure in the chip. It did not indicate
anything regarding a math co-processor.
80286 16-bit word size, 16-bit data path
80386SX 32-bit word size, 16-bit data path
80386DX 32-bit word size, 32-bit data path
Prior to the 80486, math coprocessors were always an additional
chip with their own number. Generally, that number corresponds to the
CPU number, different by one digit.
8088 CPU 8087 coprocessor
80286 CPU 80287 coprocessor
80386SX CPU 80387SX coprocessor
80386DX CPU 80387DX coprocessor
The 80486 came with a built-in math coprocessor that was either
enabled in the DX or disabled in the SX. The math-coprocessor
add-on for a 80486SX was actually a complete 80486DX chip
that was mounted in the math co-processor slot.
SX/DX means different things in a 486 than in earlier chips...
Dennis - N4NR
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
Jeffrey S Austin College of Civil Engineering
email@example.com Old Dominion University
"The road to riches was built by a Civil Engineer."