Re: [amsat-bb] Still can't get InstantTrack to work without a co-processor

[Roy Welch <rdwelch@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I stand corrected on the 486SX.  Then ITNCP is the one and should work. 
And no I don't attend the IARU meetings.  Must have someone else in mind.

Clifford Buttschardt wrote:
> 
> I'll jump in since Roy is at the IARU meeting representing AMSAT.
> Do load ITNCP and see if that runs.  Regardless of of what machine is
> used with or without a co-processor, ITNCP should perform.  Cliff K7RR
> 
> On Mon, 28 Sep 1998, Jeffrey S Austin wrote:
> 
> > Roy-
> > No, if you look at any x86 chip you'll see either a SXor DX. All SX
> > chips are without the math co-processor but generally have a socket on
> > the motherboard for that chip.
> >
> > Roy Welch wrote:
> >
> > > I thought all 486 machines had the math co-processor built into the
> > > processor.  Have you tried IT instead of ITNCP?
> > >
> >
> > --
> > =====================================================
> >   Jeffrey S Austin    College of Civil Engineering
> >   jaust004@odu.edu       Old Dominion University
> >  "The road to riches was built by a Civil Engineer."
> > =====================================================
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
> >

-- 
73, Roy

Internet: w0sl@amsat.org
Home Page: http://home.swbell.net/rdwelch
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org