[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: RE: ARRL License Restructuring Proposal



But with all the big shots trying to take away the spectrum why not make a
license and forget code to get  more people on the air and not lose  what we
have now or let every one fight and lose out all together ??????    just a
thought
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Mulvey <mulveyr@mulveyr.roc.servtech.com>
To: amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
Date: Wednesday, July 22, 1998 7:05 PM
Subject: FW: RE: [amsat-bb] ARRL License Restructuring Proposal


>
>On 22-Jul-98 Boza, Tom wrote:
>>
>> I think the easier Code requirements cheapens the ticket.
>>
>
>   It would cheapen the ticket only if CW still continued to offer an
important
>contribution to the stated goals of the Amateur Service, which are:
>
>    "To provide a trained pool of operators" - the military and commercial
>sectors no longer use Morse for "daily", and even emergency operations.
>
>    "To advance the state of the art" - Obviously, CW does absolutely
nothing
>in that regard.
>
>    "To foster international goodwill and fellowship" - SSB and other
digital
>modes do just as much in that regard, which pretty much eliminates the
>rationale for having a *mode-specific* test that results in a pass or fail
of
>the exam.
>
>   Now, that being said, CW does have a special place in that it provides a
>great deal of personal pleasure to some people - myself included - in being
>able to operate in that mode.  Personal pleasure, however, is not a
sufficient
>reason to permit or deny the use of a Federal license to someone.
>
>> I like the idea of making the written exams tougher, technically, but I
>> would like to see more questions about proper operating procedure.
>>
>
>   Absolutely, on both counts.  At this point, the written exams are truly
a
>joke.  They can, and are, easily memorized.  The schematics used on the
>Advanced test, for example, are simplistic enough that 4 year olds can
parrot
>"That diode is for DC blocking" without ever understanding what DC blocking
>actually means.  In the larger scheme of things, proper operating practices
are
>really what affect the daily use of Amateur Radio.  In that context, it
makes
>sense to concentrate on making sure that people REALLY know how to
communicate,
>correctly, in any given mode.
>
>- Rich
>
>
>--
>Rich Mulvey
>My return address is my last name,
>   followed by my first initial, @mulveyr.roc.servtech.com
>http://mulveyr.roc.servtech.com
>Amateur Radio: aa2ys@wb2wxq.#wny.ny.usa
>----
>Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
>

----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home