[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
ARRL License etc
- Subject: [amsat-bb] ARRL License etc
- From: tleonard@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 98 14:51:52 -0800
A bit of history:
Way back in the dark ages of the 1960's we had effectively THREE
classes of license: NOVICE, TECH, and GENERAL. There was an EXTRA
CLASS, but had no additional spectrum privledges. The requirement for
full HF phone operation was a 13 wpm code test and a basic electronics
theory and operating principles test. Novice license operators had
phone privledges on 2 meters. Then in the late 60's, the FCC spoke
and Incentive Licensing was born.
Here we are 30 years later and after tinkering with the system, we are
again approaching what we had 30 years ago, not something better.
(Anyone see any parallels with the public school system or the Federal
government during this same period of time ??) We have gone to more
classes of license, with more restrictions and more carrots to try to
improve the type or quality of amateur operator. For all of this
tinkering, neither the quality of amateur operator nor the technical
competence has improved one bit!! The segregaton of operators by
license class has caused more harm than good to the hobby -- just
listen to a 2 meter repeater here in LA when a new ham trys to make .
his or her first contact. I am disgusted by the treatment that these
newcomers receive!
So what is the point? The quality of amateur operator is determined
by his or her self, not necessarily by some set of tests. Most
operators, regardless of license class, care about how well their
equipment performs, and strive to be good neighbors on the amateur
bands. CW testing should be a requirment to operate CW on the amateur
bands. The CW test should test for the ablility to copy cw, not guess
at the answers. Similarly, the ability to operate PHONE should also
be tested before granting this operating privledge. Since a
transmitter is required in order to operate, the ablility to correctly
operate a transmitter should be tested.
Rather than worry about the number of license classes or the cw speed,
lets worry about providing new operators with the knowledge needed to
successfully join and shape the amateur community for the next 30
years.
BTW, I was a ham BEFORE Incentive Licensing and wish that we could go
back in time and prevent it from ever being implimented.
Tim AA6DQ
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home