[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Pacsat question



I would like to have a copy also ... I have the same question ... thanks
to all...

John
K0UWT
Springfield, MO

Anthony Bombardiere wrote:

> Hi all...
>
> I would like to thank all the guys and gals who responded to
> my pacsat tnc questions.
>
> It seems that many ops enjoy working the 9600 birds more than
> the slower 1200. The speed advantage is obvious and one op said
> that activity on the 1200 bps birds is not nearly as much as the
> faster 9600 pacsats. I was hoping that I wouldn't have to modify
> my Kenwood TS790 for 9600 as I'm not exactly proficient at that
> sort of operation...but it seems ashame to have a modem capable of
> 9600 operation and not utilize it.  A few ops also said that the
> image files from the 9600 birds are much better than that of the
> 1200's.
>
> I was wondering if there is a  WEB page where I can see for myself
> what the diference is between the image files, etc. of the 1200
> and 9600 birds.
>
> If anyone can send a typical image file or any other file via
> e-mail from K0-22 or any of the pacsats, I can make a comparison
> myself. I will be purchasing a DSP modem soon, and at least I
> can decide if I realy need the 9600 capability.
>
> All the best and thanks ....de AB2CJ.






AMSAT Top AMSAT Home