I would like to have a copy also ... I have the same question ... thanks to all... John K0UWT Springfield, MO Anthony Bombardiere wrote: > Hi all... > > I would like to thank all the guys and gals who responded to > my pacsat tnc questions. > > It seems that many ops enjoy working the 9600 birds more than > the slower 1200. The speed advantage is obvious and one op said > that activity on the 1200 bps birds is not nearly as much as the > faster 9600 pacsats. I was hoping that I wouldn't have to modify > my Kenwood TS790 for 9600 as I'm not exactly proficient at that > sort of operation...but it seems ashame to have a modem capable of > 9600 operation and not utilize it. A few ops also said that the > image files from the 9600 birds are much better than that of the > 1200's. > > I was wondering if there is a WEB page where I can see for myself > what the diference is between the image files, etc. of the 1200 > and 9600 birds. > > If anyone can send a typical image file or any other file via > e-mail from K0-22 or any of the pacsats, I can make a comparison > myself. I will be purchasing a DSP modem soon, and at least I > can decide if I realy need the 9600 capability. > > All the best and thanks ....de AB2CJ.